Skip directly to content

A timely "Ask Me" from Ed Hines of Roswell, Georgia:

Where you cite your experience under your new-book section on your home page, should not "years" indicate possession? A missing apostrophe perhaps?

The full quote Ed's referring to says How to Not Write Bad "is based largely on my twenty years experience teaching writing at the University of Delaware." And he suggests it should say "twenty years' experience." My answer to his first question is "No," and because of that, my answer to his second question is, "Perhaps, but perhaps not." (A clue to the [philosophical] place from which Ed is coming is the way he deftly hyphenates "new-book.")

The apostrophe is without question the traditional way to go. But for some years there has been a move away from it for certain plural "possessives." Sir Ernest Gowers brings this up in his 1965 revision of H.W. Fowler's Modern English Usage. Discussing "Five years' imprisonment...

Tags:

In my never-ending attempt to get with the social-media program, I have been regularly posting writing tips on Twitter, with the (logical) hashtag #YagodaTip.

To give you a taste of how much you can cram into 129 characters (I have to leave room for the hashtag) here are a couple of examples:

  • "A lot of good writers use the semicolon well; a lot of bad writers abuse it. There's one very common semicolon error; this one."
  • "Do good writers use rhetorical questions? Yes--but they make sure to answer them (or explain why they can't) in the next sentence."
  • "A seemingly obvious but often overlooked remedy for word repetition is the use of ... wait for it... pronouns."

If this kind of thing is your cup of tea, follow me: there's plenty more where that came from.

My daughter recently wrote the sentence, "If someone other than Dullhead touched the goose, they stuck." I think we need something like "got" or "became" before "stuck." I also think it needs a preposition afterwards saying what he got stuck to (the goose).

I looked up "stuck," and most online dictionaries say it can be both past tense and past participle.  I would almost never say, "The caramel spilled all over the floor, and I stuck in it."  I think I could say that, but "I got stuck in it," or "I became stuck in it," would be more likely.

Now this could be avoided entirely if she had written the summary of "The Golden Goose" in the present tense.  I recently came across a writing book for children that said, "When you talk or write about what happens in a story, you should always use the present tense."  In all my years of schooling, I don't remember ever being instructed to do that.  Have I been doing it wrong all these years?

In...

Tags:

The New Yorker‘s anniversary issue (Simon Greiner’s cover of a tattooed Williamsburg hipster as Eustace Tilley is at left) has a lot of delights in it. Ian Frazier on Staten Island! Susan Orlean on Walmart art! Fiction by Zadie Smith! Emily Nussbaum on Girls! Poems by Philip Levine and W.S. Merwin! Cartoons by Jack Ziegler and Edward Koren! But the wonder of wonders is a...

Does it bother you that writers in the Times and other publications have recently been putting the word "for" after the word advocate, which already means speak for and hardly needs another "for"?--Richard Dudman

My first impulse was to answer the question, "Not especially." But on reflection, I'll change that to "not at all." One of the Oxford English Dictionary's (OED) definition for the verb advocate (without the for) is: "To act as an advocate for; to support, recommend, or speak in favour of (a person or thing)." There is a citation as early as 1599, but nearly two hundred years later, it still met with disapproval as a neologism. Benjamin Franklin wrote in a 1789 letter: "During my late absence in France, I find that several other new words have been introduced into our parliamentary language. For example I find a verb..from the substantive advocate; The gentleman who advocates, or who has...

Tags:

Pages